• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 125, 024506 (2006); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2215613 (12 pages)

Static and dynamic critical behavior of a symmetrical binary fluid: A computer simulation

Subir K. Das1, Jürgen Horbach2, Kurt Binder2, Michael E. Fisher1, and Jan V. Sengers1

1Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
2Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Staudinger Weg 7, 55099 Mainz, Germany

View MapView Map

(Received 7 April 2006; accepted 25 May 2006; published online 14 July 2006)

A symmetrical binary, A+B Lennard-Jones mixture is studied by a combination of semi-grand-canonical Monte Carlo (SGMC) and molecular dynamics (MD) methods near a liquid-liquid critical temperature Tc. Choosing equal chemical potentials for the two species, the SGMC switches identities (ABA) to generate well-equilibrated configurations of the system on the coexistence curve for T<Tc and at the critical concentration, xc = 1/2, for T>Tc. A finite-size scaling analysis of the concentration susceptibility above Tc and of the order parameter below Tc is performed, varying the number of particles from N = 400 to 12 800. The data are fully compatible with the expected critical exponents of the three-dimensional Ising universality class. The equilibrium configurations from the SGMC runs are used as initial states for microcanonical MD runs, from which transport coefficients are extracted. Self-diffusion coefficients are obtained from the Einstein relation, while the interdiffusion coefficient and the shear viscosity are estimated from Green-Kubo expressions. As expected, the self-diffusion constant does not display a detectable critical anomaly. With appropriate finite-size scaling analysis, we show that the simulation data for the shear viscosity and the mutual diffusion constant are quite consistent both with the theoretically predicted behavior, including the critical exponents and amplitudes, and with the most accurate experimental evidence.

© 2006 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. MODEL AND SIMULATION TECHNIQUES
  3. STATIC CRITICAL PROPERTIES
  4. SELF-DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT AND SHEAR VISCOSITY NEAR CRITICALITY
  5. INTERDIFFUSION: FINITE-SIZE SCALING
  6. SUMMARY

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 61.20.Ja

    Computer simulation of liquid structure

  • 66.10.C-

    Diffusion and thermal diffusion

  • 66.20.-d

    Viscosity of liquids; diffusive momentum transport

  • 64.60.F-

    Equilibrium properties near critical points, critical exponents

  • 64.70.Ja

    Liquid-liquid transitions

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    M. E. Fisher and G. Orkoulas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 696 (2000)
    G. Orkoulas, M. E. Fisher, and C. Üstün, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7530 (2000)JCPSA6000113000017007530000001.

    E. Luijten, M. E. Fisher, and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 185701 (2002).

    H. C. Burstyn and J. V. Sengers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 259 (1980)
    Phys. Rev. A 25, 448 (1982).

    L. P. Kadanoff and J. Swift, Phys. Rev. 166, 89 (1968).

    J. Luettmer-Strathmann, J. V. Sengers, and G. A. Olchowy, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7482 (1995)JCPSA6000103000017007482000001.

    J. Luettmer-Strathmann and J. V. Sengers, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 3026 (1996)JCPSA6000104000008003026000001.

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977).

    R. Folk and G. Moser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2706 (1995).

    T. Hamanaka, R. Yamamoto, and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. E 71, 011507 (2005).

    A. Chen, E. H. Chimowitz, S. De, and Y. Shapir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 255701 (2005). These authors found results for thermal equilibration at criticality that were consistent with theoretical predictions; but they noticed the large discrepancy with the conclusions of JY (Ref. 24) and expressed the hope that future investigations would clarify the issue. We believe our work does that.

    K. Jagannathan and A. Yethiraj, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 015701 (2004)
    J. Chem. Phys. 122, 244506 (2005)JCPSA6000122000024244506000001;, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 069602 (2005).

    B. Widom and J. S. Rowlinson, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 1670 (1970)JCPSA6000052000004001670000001.

    J. V. Sengers and M. R. Moldover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 069601 (2005).

    S. K. Das, J. Horbach, and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 1547 (2003)JCPSA6000119000003001547000001.

    E. de Miguel, E. Martin del Rio, and M. M. Telo da Gama, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 6188 (1995)JCPSA6000103000014006188000001.

    Y. C. Kim, M. E. Fisher, and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 195703 (2005).

    R. Kutner, K. Binder, and K. W. Kehr, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2967 (1982).

    K. R. Harris, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6379 (2002)JCPSA6000116000014006379000001.

    R. F. Berg, M. R. Moldover, and G. A. Zimmerli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 920 (1999)
    Phys. Rev. E 60, 4079 (1999).

    J. V. Sengers and P. H. Keyes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 70 (1971).

    S. K. Das, M. E. Fisher, J. V. Sengers, J. Horbach, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 025702 (2006).

    M. E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 597 (1974).

    H. C. Burstyn, J. V. Sengers, and P. Esfandiari, Phys. Rev. A 22, 282 (1980).

    H. C. Burstyn, J. V. Sengers, J. K. Bhattacharjee, and R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1567 (1983).

    R. A. Wilkinson, G. A. Zimmerli, H. Hao, M. R. Moldover, R. F. Berg, W. L. Johnson, R. A. Ferrell, and R. W. Gammon, Phys. Rev. E 57, 436 (1998).


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (13)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close