• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 111, 8819 (1999); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.480228 (6 pages)

Comparison study of the prediction of Raman intensities using electronic structure methods

Mathew D. Halls and H. Bernhard Schlegel

Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA, 48202-3489

(Received 14 June 1999; accepted 25 August 1999)

Raman intensities have been computed for a series of test molecules (N2, H2S, H2O, H2CO, CH4, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, SiO2, NH3, CH2F2, and CH2Cl2) using Hartree–Fock, second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and density functional theory, including local, gradient-corrected, and hybrid methods (S-VWN, B-LYP and B3-LYP, and MPW1-PW91) to evaluate their relative performance. Comparisons were made with three different basis sets: 6-31G(d), Sadlej, and aug-cc-pVTZ. The quality of basis set used was found to be the most important factor in achieving quantitative results. The medium sized Sadlej basis provided excellent quantitative Raman intensities, comparable to those obtained with the much larger aug-cc-pVTZ basis set. Harmonic vibrational frequencies computed with the Sadlej basis set were in good agreement with experimental fundamentals. For the quantitative prediction of vibrational Raman spectra, the Sadlej basis set is an excellent compromise between computational cost and quality of results. © 1999 American Institute of Physics.

© 1999 American Institute of Physics

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 33.20.Fb

    Raman and Rayleigh spectra (including optical scattering)

  • 31.15.xr

    Self-consistent-field methods

  • 31.15.xp

    Perturbation theory

  • 31.15.E-

    Density-functional theory

  • 33.20.Tp

    Vibrational analysis

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    M. Delhaye, M. C. Dhamelincourt, and E. Dasilva, Rev. Inst. Fr. Petrol. 48, 183 (1993)JCPSA6000098000007005648000001.

    D. Porezag and M. R. Pederson, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7830 (1996).

    J. R. Thomas, B. J. DeLeeuw, G. Vacek, T. D. Crawford, Y. Yamagucki, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 403 (1993)JCPSA6000099000001000403000001.

    M. D. Halls and H. B. Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10587 (1998)JCPSA6000109000024010587000001.

    A. Komornicki and J. W. MvIver, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 2014 (1979)JCPSA6000070000004002014000001.

    M. J. Frisch, Y. Yamaguchi, J. F. Gaw, H. F. Schaeffer, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 531 (1985)JCPSA6000084000001000531000001.

    A. Stirling, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1254 (1996)JCPSA6000104000004001254000001.

    C. Møller and M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev. B 46, 618 (1934).

    A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988).

    C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988).

    A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993)JCPSA6000098000007005648000001.

    T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. , 90, 1007 (1989)JCPSA6000090000002001007000001.

    R. A. Kendall, T. H. Dunning, Jr., and R. J. Harrison, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6769 (1992)JCPSA6000096000009006796000001.

    D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1358 (1993)JCPSA6000098000002001358000001.

    M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3265 (1984)JCPSA6000080000007003265000001.

    Y. Yamaguchi, M. Frisch, J. Gaw, H. F. Schaefer, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2262 (1986)JCPSA6000084000004002262000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close