• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 129, 144904 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2992047 (9 pages)

On the relationship between two popular lattice models for polymer melts

Gopinath Subramanian1 and Sachin Shanbhag1,2

1Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4120, USA
2Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Tallahassee, Florida 32310-6046, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 18 July 2008; accepted 10 September 2008; published online 14 October 2008)

A mapping between two well known lattice bond-fluctuation models for polymers [ I. Carmesin and K. Kremer, Macromolecules 21, 2819 (1988) ; J. S. Shaffer, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4205 (1994) ] is investigated by performing primitive path analysis to identify the average number of monomers per entanglement. Simulations conducted using both models, and previously published data are compared in an attempt to establish relationships between molecular weight, lengthscale, and timescale. Using these relationships, an examination of the self-diffusion coefficient yields excellent agreement not only between the two models, but also with experimental data on polystyrene, polybutadiene, and polydimethylsiloxane. However, it is shown that even with the limited set of criteria examined in this paper, a true mapping between these two models is elusive. Nevertheless, a practical guide to convert between models is provided.

© 2008 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. PRINCIPLE BEHIND A MAPPING
  3. MODEL AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. SUMMARY

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    R. Auhl, R. Everaers, G. S. Grest, K. Kremer, and S. J. Plimpton, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 12718 (2003)JCPSA6000036000001000227000001.

    P. H. Verdier and W. H. Stockmayer, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 227 (1962)JCPSA6000036000001000227000001.

    A. Baumgärtner and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 2541 (1979)JCPSA6000071000006002541000001.

    H. P. Deutsch and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2294 (1991)JCPSA6000094000003002294000001.

    J. S. Shaffer, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4205 (1994)JCPSA6000101000005004205000001.

    J. S. Shaffer, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 761 (1995)JCPSA6000103000002000761000001.

    S. Shanbhag and R. G. Larson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 076001 (2005).

    W. Paul, K. Binder, D. W. Heermann, and K. Kremer, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7726 (1991)JCPSA6000095000010007726000001.

    I. Gerroff, A. Milchev, K. Binder, and W. Paul, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6526 (1993)JCPSA6000098000008006526000001.

    J. Luettmer-Strathmann and M. Mantina, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 174907 (2006)JCPSA6000124000017174907000001.

    T. P. Lodge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3218 (1999).


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (8) Tables (4)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close