• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 129, 214106 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.3026605 (10 pages)

On collisional energy transfer in recombination and dissociation reactions: A Wiener–Hopf problem and the effect of a near elastic peak

Zhaoyan Zhu and R. A. Marcus

Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 12 June 2008; accepted 22 October 2008; published online 2 December 2008)

The effect of the large impact parameter near-elastic peak of collisional energy transfer for unimolecular dissociation/bimolecular recombination reactions is studied. To this end, the conventional single exponential model, a biexponential model that fits the literature classical trajectory data better, a model with a singularity at zero energy transfer, and the most realistic model, a model with a near-singularity, are fitted to the trajectory data in the literature. The typical effect of the energy transfer on the recombination rate constant is maximal at low pressures and this region is the one studied here. The distribution function for the limiting dissociation rate constant k0 at low pressures is shown to obey a Wiener–Hopf integral equation and is solved analytically for the first two models and perturbatively for the other two. For the single exponential model, this method yields the trial solution of Troe. The results are applied to the dissociation of O3 in the presence of argon, for which classical mechanical trajectory data are available. The k0’s for various models are calculated and compared, the value for the near-singularity model being about ten times larger than that for the first two models. This trend reflects the contribution to the cross section from collisions with larger impact parameter. In the present study of the near-singularity model, it is found that k0 is not sensitive to reasonable values for the lower bound. Energy transfer values 〈ΔE’s are also calculated and compared and can be similarly understood. However, unlike the k0 values, they are sensitive to the lower bound, and so any comparison of a classical trajectory analysis for 〈ΔE’s with the kinetic experimental data needs particular care.

© 2008 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. THEORY
    1. General aspects
    2. Single exponential model
    3. Biexponential model
    4. Singularity model
    5. Near-singularity model
  3. APPLICATION TO Ar+O3
    1. Comparison of single exponential and biexponential models
    2. Comparison of single exponential and singularity models
    3. Comparison of single exponential and near-singularity models
  4. DISCUSSION
  5. CONCLUDING REMARKS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 82.30.Lp

    Decomposition reactions (pyrolysis, dissociation, and fragmentation)

  • 82.30.Fi

    Ion-molecule, ion-ion, and charge-transfer reactions

  • 82.20.Nk

    Classical theories of reactions and/or energy transfer

  • 82.20.Pm

    Rate constants, reaction cross sections, and activation energies

  • 82.30.Nr

    Association, addition, insertion, cluster formation

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    D. C. Tardy and B. S. Rabinovitch, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 3720 (1966)JCPSA6000045000010003720000001.

    W. G. Valance and E. W. Schlag, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 4280 (1966)JCPSA6000045000011004280000001.

    J. Troe, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 4745 (1977)JCPSA6000066000011004745000001.

    Y. Q. Gao and R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 137 (2002)JCPSA6000116000001000137000001.

    Y. Q. Gao and R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 1536 (2002)JCPSA6000117000004001536000001.

    B. C. Hathorn and R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 4087 (1999)JCPSA6000111000009004087000001.

    D. Charlo and D. C. Clary, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 2700 (2004)JCPSA6000120000006002700000001.

    D. Babikov, B. K. Kendrick, R. B. Walker, P. R. Fleurat-Lessard, and R. Schinke, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 2577 (2003)JCPSA6000119000005002577000001.

    B. C. Hathorn and R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9497 (2000)JCPSA6000113000021009497000001.

    G. H. Kohlmaier and B. S. Rabinovitch, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 1692 (1963)JCPSA6000038000007001692000001.

    J. W. Simons, B. S. Rabinovitch, and D. W. Setser, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 800 (1964)JCPSA6000041000003000800000001.

    N. J. Brown and J. A. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5568 (1984)JCPSA6000080000011005568000001.

    D. L. Clarke, I. Oref, and R. G. Gilbert, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 5983 (1992)JCPSA6000096000008005983000001.

    M. V. Ivanov, S. Y. Grebenshchikov, and R. Schinke, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10015 (2004)JCPSA6000120000021010015000001.

    A. J. Stace and J. N. Murrell, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 3028 (1978)JCPSA6000068000007003028000001.

    A. P. Penner and W. J. Forst, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5296 (1977)JCPSA6000067000011005296000001.

    M. V. Ivanov and R. Schinke, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 234318 (2005)JCPSA6000122000023234318000001.

    N. J. Brown and J. A. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5568 (1984)JCPSA6000080000011005568000001.

    J. Keck and G. J. Carrier, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 2284 (1965)JCPSA6000043000007002284000001.

    A. P. Penner and W. Forst, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 5296 (1977)JCPSA6000067000011005296000001.

    T. Kato, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 6611 (1998)JCPSA6000108000016006611000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (1) Tables (3)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close