• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 133, 244105 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3507878 (10 pages)

Electronic coupling matrix elements from charge constrained density functional theory calculations using a plane wave basis set

Harald Oberhofer1 and Jochen Blumberger2

1Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

View MapView Map

(Received 9 July 2010; accepted 12 October 2010; published online 22 December 2010)

We present a plane wave basis set implementation for the calculation of electronic coupling matrix elements of electron transfer reactions within the framework of constrained density functional theory (CDFT). Following the work of Wu and Van Voorhis [J. Chem. Phys. 125, 164105 (2006)], the diabatic wavefunctions are approximated by the Kohn–Sham determinants obtained from CDFT calculations, and the coupling matrix element calculated by an efficient integration scheme. Our results for intermolecular electron transfer in small systems agree very well with high-level ab initio calculations based on generalized Mulliken–Hush theory, and with previous local basis set CDFT calculations. The effect of thermal fluctuations on the coupling matrix element is demonstrated for intramolecular electron transfer in the tetrathiafulvalene-diquinone (Q-TTF-Q) anion. Sampling the electronic coupling along density functional based molecular dynamics trajectories, we find that thermal fluctuations, in particular the slow bending motion of the molecule, can lead to changes in the instantaneous electron transfer rate by more than an order of magnitude. The thermal average, (〈|H ab |2〉)1/2 = 6.7 mH, is significantly higher than the value obtained for the minimum energy structure, |H ab | = 3.8 mH. While CDFT in combination with generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functionals describes the intermolecular electron transfer in the studied systems well, exact exchange is required for Q-TTF-Q in order to obtain coupling matrix elements in agreement with experiment (3.9 mH). The implementation presented opens up the possibility to compute electronic coupling matrix elements for extended systems where donor, acceptor, and the environment are treated at the quantum mechanical (QM) level.

© 2010 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. THEORY
    1. CDFT
    2. H ab from CDFT
    3. Calculation of math and math [Eqs. (12) and (13)]
    4. H ab from FO-DFT
  3. COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS
  4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    1. He 2+
    2. Zn 2+
    3. Benzene–Cl
    4. Dependence of H ab on the weight function
    5. Q-TTF-Q
  5. CONCLUDING REMARKS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 34.70.+e

    Charge transfer

  • 34.20.Gj

    Intermolecular and atom-molecule potentials and forces

  • 31.15.E-

    Density-functional theory

  • 31.15.at

    Molecule transport characteristics; molecular dynamics; electronic structure of polymers

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 24, 966 (1956)JCPSA6000024000005000966000001.

    T. Pacher, L. S. Cederbaum, and H. Köppel, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 7367 (1988)JCPSA6000089000012007367000001.

    R. J. Cave and M. D. Newton, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9213 (1997)JCPSA6000106000022009213000001.

    A. A. Voityuk and N. Rösch, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 5607 (2002)JCPSA6000117000012005607000001.

    K. Senthilkumar, F. C. Grozema, F. M. Bickelhaupt, and L. D. A. Siebbeles, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 9809 (2003)JCPSA6000119000018009809000001.

    A. Migliore, S. Corni, R. Di Felice, and E. Molinari, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 064501 (2006)JCPSA6000124000006064501000001.

    J. E. Subotnik, S. Yeganeh, R. J. Cave, and M. A. Ratner, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 244101 (2008)JCPSA6000129000024244101000001.

    J. E. Subotnik, R. J. Cave, R. P. Steele, and N. Shenvi, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 234102 (2009)JCPSA6000130000023234102000001.

    Q. Wu and T. Van Voorhis, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 164105 (2006)JCPSA6000125000016164105000001.

    J. R. Schmidt, N. Shenvi, and J. C. Tully, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 114110 (2008)JCPSA6000129000011114110000001.

    H. Oberhofer and J. Blumberger, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 064101 (2009)JCPSA6000131000006064101000001.

    P. Gosh and R. Gebauer, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 104102 (2010)JCPSA6000132000010104102000001.

    A. Mukherji and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 44 (1963)JCPSA6000038000001000044000001.

    C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 37, 785 (1988).

    P. A. Pieniazek, S. A. Arnstein, S. E. Bradforth, A. I. Krylov, and C. D. Sherrill, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 164110 (2007)JCPSA6000127000016164110000001.

    M. Guidon, F. Schiffmann, J. Hutter, and J. VandeVondele, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 214104 (2008)JCPSA6000128000021214104000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (7) Tables (3)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close