• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 133, 054501 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3463653 (10 pages)

Trading sensitivity for information: Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill acquisition in solid-state NMR

Krishna K. Dey, Jason T. Ash, Nicole M. Trease, and Philip J. Grandinetti

Department of Chemistry, Ohio State University, 100 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 22 March 2010; accepted 23 June 2010; published online 2 August 2010)

The Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) experiment has gained popularity in solid-state NMR as a method for enhancing sensitivity for anisotropically broadened spectra of both spin 1/2 and half integer quadrupolar nuclei. Most commonly, the train of CPMG echoes is Fourier transformed directly, which causes the NMR powder pattern to break up into a series of sidebands, sometimes called “spikelets.” Larger sensitivity enhancements are observed as the delay between the π pulses is shortened. As the duration between the π pulses is shortened, however, the echoes become truncated and information about the nuclear spin interactions is lost. We explored the relationship between enhanced sensitivity and loss of information as a function of the product Ω 2τ, where Ω is the span of the anisotropic lineshape and 2τ is the π pulse spacing. For a lineshape dominated by the nuclear shielding anisotropy, we found that the minimum uncertainty in the tensor values is obtained using Ω 2τ values in the range Ω 2τ ≈ 12−1+6 and Ω 2τ ≈ 9−3+3 for ηs = 0 and ηs = 1, respectively. For an anisotropic second-order quadrupolar central transition lineshape under magic-angle spinning (MAS), the optimum range of Ω 2τ ≈ 9−2+3 was found. Additionally, we show how the Two-dimensional One Pulse (TOP) like processing approach can be used to eliminate the cumbersome sideband pattern lineshape and recover a more familiar lineshape that is easily analyzed with conventional lineshape simulation algorithms.

© 2010 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENTAL
    1. Span
  3. TOP PROCESSING FOR CPMG DATA
  4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    1. First-order chemical shift
    2. Second-order quadrupolar coupling
  5. SUMMARY

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 94, 630 (1954).

    S. Meiboom and D. Gill, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29, 688 (1958)RSINAK000029000008000688000001.

    E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev. 80, 580 (1950).

    R. Lefort, J. W. Wiench, M. Pruski, and J. P. Amoureux, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2493 (2002)JCPSA6000116000006002493000001.

    P. Hodgkinson and L. Emsley, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4808 (1997)JCPSA6000107000013004808000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (10) Tables (4)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close