• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 134, 214503 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3592709 (12 pages)

The role of attractive forces in viscous liquids

Ludovic Berthier1 and Gilles Tarjus2

1Laboratoire Charles Coulomb, UMR 5221, CNRS and Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France
2LPTMC, UMR 7600, CNRS and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

View MapView Map

(Received 2 March 2011; accepted 30 April 2011; published online 1 June 2011)

We present evidence from computer simulation that the slowdown of relaxation of a standard Lennard-Jones glass-forming liquid and that of its reduction to a model with truncated pair potentials without attractive tails are quantitatively and qualitatively different in the viscous regime. The pair structure of the two models is however very similar. This finding, which appears to contradict the common view that the physics of dense liquids is dominated by the steep repulsive forces between atoms, is characterized in detail, and its consequences are explored. Beyond the role of attractive forces themselves, a key aspect in explaining the differences in the dynamical behavior of the two models is the truncation of the interaction potentials beyond a cutoff at typical interatomic distance. This leads us to question the ability of the jamming scenario to describe the physics of glass-forming liquids and polymers.

© 2011 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. MODELS, SIMULATION, AND PHASE DIAGRAM
    1. Models
    2. Thermodynamics and phase diagram
  3. CONTRASTING THE BEHAVIOR OF THE PAIR STRUCTURE AND OF THE DYNAMICS
    1. Pair correlation functions
    2. Dynamic correlations and timescales
    3. Two-dimensional case and other examples
    4. To be, or not to be (perturbative)
  4. ON THE DENSITY SCALING FOR THE RELAXATION TIME
    1. Density scaling in supercooled liquids and polymers
    2. Empirical data collapse
    3. Analogy with power-law repulsive spheres
  5. IS THE ABSENCE OR PRESENCE OF (APPROXIMATE) SCALING DUE TO ATTRACTION OR TO TRUNCATION IN THE POTENTIAL?
  6. GLASS TRANSITION VERSUS JAMMING PHENOMENON
  7. CONCLUSION

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 66.20.Ej

    Studies of viscosity and rheological properties of specific liquids

  • 64.70.pj

    Polymers

  • 64.70.pm

    Liquids

  • 61.20.Ja

    Computer simulation of liquid structure

  • 66.20.Cy

    Theory and modeling of viscosity and rheological properties, including computer simulation

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    J. D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971)JCPSA6000054000012005237000001.

    J. Kushick and B. J. Berne, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 3732 (1973)JCPSA6000059000007003732000001.

    D. P. Dean and J. N. Kushick, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 621 (1982)JCPSA6000076000001000619000001.

    L. Berthier and G. Tarjus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 170601 (2009).

    D. Fragiadakis and C. M. Roland, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 044504 (2011)JCPSA6000134000004044504000001.

    L. Berthier and T. A. Witten, Phys. Rev. E 80, 021502 (2009).

    N. Xu, T. Haxton, A. Liu, and S. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 245701 (2009).

    W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1376 (1994).

    A. Carré, L. Berthier, J. Horbach, S. Ispas, and W. Kob, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 114512 (2007)JCPSA6000127000011114512000001.

    S. Sastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 590 (2000).

    T. Voigtmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 095701 (2008).

    C. S. O'Hern, S. A. Langer, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. E 68, 011306 (2003).

    S. H. Sung, D. Chandler, and B. J. Alder, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 932 (1974)JCPSA6000061000003000932000001.

    N. Lacevic, F. W. Starr, T. B. Schroder, and S. C. Glotzer, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 7372 (2003)JCPSA6000119000014007372000001.

    D. Chandler, J. P. Garrahan, R. L. Jack, L. Maibaum, and A. C. Pan, Phys. Rev. E 74, 051501 (2006).

    A. Parsaeian and H. E. Castillo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 055704 (2009).

    D. Coslovich and C. M. Roland, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 151103 (2009)JCPSA6000131000015151103000001.

    Y. Brumer and D. R. Reichman, Phys. Rev. E 69, 041202 (2004).

    U. R. Pedersen, N. P. Bailey, T. B. Schroder, and J. C. Dyre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 015701 (2008)
    N. P. Bailey, U. R. Pedersen, N. Gnan, T. B. Schroder, and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 039902 (2009)JCPSA6000130000003039902000001.

    A. Donev, S. Torquato, F. H. Stillinger, and R. Connelly, Phys. Rev. E 70, 043301 (2004).

    P. Chaudhuri, L. Berthier, and S. Sastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 165701 (2010).

    G. Parisi and F. Zamponi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 789 (2010).

    G. Brambilla, D. El Masri, M. Pierno, G. Petekidis, A. B. Schofield, L. Berthier, and L. Cipelletti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 085703 (2009).

    J. Taffs, A. Malins, S. Williams, and C. P. Royall, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 244901 (2010)JCPSA6000133000024244901000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (12) Tables (1)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close