• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 135, 125104 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3636383 (10 pages)

Influence of mobile DNA-protein-DNA bridges on DNA configurations: Coarse-grained Monte-Carlo simulations

Renko de Vries

Laboratory of Physical Chemistry and Colloid Science, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8038, 6700 EK Wageningen, The Netherlands

View MapView Map

(Received 18 May 2011; accepted 21 August 2011; published online 30 September 2011)

A large literature exists on modeling the influence of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins on the shape of the DNA double helix in terms of one or a few fixed constraints. This approach is inadequate for the many proteins that bind DNA sequence independently, and that are present in very large quantities rather than as a few copies, such as the nucleoid proteins in bacterial cells. The influence of such proteins on DNA configurations is better modeled in terms of a great number of mobile constraints on the DNA. Types of constraints that mimic the influence of various known non-specifically DNA binding proteins include DNA bending, wrapping, and bridging. Using Monte-Carlo simulations, we here investigate the influence of (non-interacting) mobile DNA-protein-DNA bridges on the configurations of a 1000 bp piece of linear DNA, for both homogeneous DNA and DNA with an intrinsic planar bend. Results are compared to experimental data on the bacterial nucleoid protein H-NS that forms DNA-protein-DNA bridges. In agreement with data on H-NS, we find very strong positioning of DNA-protein-DNA bridges in the vicinity of planar bends. H-NS binds to DNA very cooperatively, but for non-interacting bridges we only find a moderate DNA-induced clustering. Finally, it has been suggested that H-NS is an important contributor to the extreme condensation of bacterial DNA into a nucleoid structure, but we find only a moderate compaction of DNA coils with increasing numbers of non-interacting bridges. Our results illustrate the importance of quantifying the various effects on DNA configurations that have been proposed for proteins that bind DNA sequence independently.

© 2011 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. MODEL AND METHODS
    1. DNA model
    2. Mobile DNA-protein-DNA bridges
    3. Parameter values
    4. Monte-Carlo simulation
  3. RESULTS
    1. Planar curvature
    2. Positioning of single constraint
    3. DNA-induced clustering of bridges
    4. Compaction by multiple constraints
  4. DISCUSSION

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    H. Yamakawa and W. H. Stockmayer, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 2843 (1972)JCPSA6000057000007002843000001.

    A. Balaeff, L. Mahadevan, and K. Schulten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4900 (1999).

    J. Yan and J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. E 68, 011905 (2003).

    J. M. G. Vilar and L. Saiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 238103 (2006).

    B. Mergell, M. R. Ejtehadi, and R. Everaers, Phys. Rev. E 68, 021911 (2003).


Figures (15) Tables (4)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close