• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 136, 014510 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3669449 (9 pages)

Nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of dynamics in poly(ethylene oxide)-based lithium polyether-ester-sulfonate ionomers

David J. Roach1, Shichen Dou2, Ralph H. Colby2, and Karl T. Mueller1,3

1Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
3William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 26 July 2011; accepted 22 November 2011; published online 6 January 2012)

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been utilized to investigate the dynamics of poly(ethylene oxide)-based lithium sulfonate ionomer samples that have low glass transition temperatures. 1H and 7Li spin-lattice relaxation times (T1) of the bulk polymer and lithium ions, respectively, were measured and analyzed in samples with a range of ion contents. The temperature dependence of T1 values along with the presence of minima in T1 as a function of temperature enabled correlation times and activation energies to be obtained for both the segmental motion of the polymer backbone and the hopping motion of lithium cations. Similar activation energies for motion of both the polymer and lithium ions in the samples with lower ion content indicate that the polymer segmental motion and lithium ion hopping motion are correlated in these samples, even though lithium hopping is about ten times slower than the segmental motion. A divergent trend is observed for correlation times and activation energies of the highest ion content sample with 100% lithium sulfonation due to the presence of ionic aggregation. Details of the polymer and cation dynamics on the nanosecond timescale are discussed and complement the findings of X-ray scattering and quasi-elastic neutron scattering experiments.

© 2012 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENTAL
  3. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
  4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  5. CONCLUSIONS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    R. J. Klein, S. H. Zhang, S. Dou, B. H. Jones, R. H. Colby, and J. Runt, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 144903 (2006)JCPSA6000124000014144903000001.

    D. Fragiadakis, S. Dou, R. H. Colby, and J. Runt, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 064907 (2009)JCPSA6000130000006064907000001.

    S. H. Chung, K. R. Jeffery, and J. J. Stevens, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 3360 (1998)JCPSA6000108000008003360000001.

    J. P. Donoso, T. J. Bonagamba, H. C. Panepucci, L. N. Oliveria, W. Gorecki, C. Berthier, and M. Armand, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10026 (1993)JCPSA6000098000012010026000001.

    N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 73, 679 (1948).

    W. Davison and R. H. Cole, J. Chem. Phys. 19, 1484 (1951)JCPSA6000019000012001484000001.

    P. Mustarelli, C. Capiglia, E. Quartarone, C. Tomasi, P. Ferloni, and L. Linati, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7228 (1999).

    K. Hayamizu, Y. Aihara, and W. S. Price, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 4785 (2000)JCPSA6000113000011004785000001.


Figures (10) Tables (5)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close