• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You Tube Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Chem. Phys. 136, 014901 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3672103 (14 pages)

An immersed boundary method for Brownian dynamics simulation of polymers in complex geometries: Application to DNA flowing through a nanoslit with embedded nanopits

Yu Zhang, Juan J. de Pablo, and Michael D. Graham

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1691, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 12 April 2011; accepted 4 December 2011; published online 4 January 2012)

This work presents an immersed boundary method that allows fast Brownian dynamics simulation of solutions of polymer chains and other Brownian objects in complex geometries with fluctuating hydrodynamics. The approach is based on the general geometry Ewald-like method, which solves the Stokes equation with distributed regularized point forces in O(N) or O(NlogN) operations, where N is the number of point forces in the system. Time-integration is performed using a midpoint algorithm and Chebyshev polynomial approximation proposed by Fixman. This approach is applied to the dynamics of a genomic DNA molecule driven by flow through a nanofluidic slit with an array of nanopits on one wall of the slit. The dynamics of the DNA molecule was studied as a function of the Péclet number and chain length (the base case being λ-DNA). The transport characteristics of the hopping dynamics in this device differ at low and high Péclet number, and for long DNA, relative to the pit size, the dynamics is governed by the segments residing in the pit. By comparing with results that neglect them, hydrodynamic interactions are shown to play an important quantitative role in the hopping dynamics.

© 2012 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. METHODS FOR HYDRODYNAMICS OF CONFINED POLYMER SOLUTIONS
  3. POLYMER MODEL AND SIMULATION METHOD
    1. Model and governing equations
    2. Governing equations
    3. Mobility tensor and time-integration algorithm
    4. Chebyshev approximation
    5. Fast Stokes solver with complex boundary conditions
      1. Immersed boundary method
      2. Periodic GGEM
      3. Local velocity field
      4. Global velocity field
      5. Validation: GGEM
      6. Validation: IBM
  4. DNA FLOWING ACROSS AN ARRAY OF NANOPITS
    1. Dynamics at low Péclet number
    2. Dynamics at high Péclet number
  5. CONCLUSIONS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-9606 (print)  
1089-7690 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    J. L. Viovy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 813 (2000).

    R. B. Schoch, J. Han, and P. Renaud, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 839 (2008).

    K. D. Dorfman Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2903 (2010).

    A. Alvarez and R. Soto, Phys. Fluids 17, 093103 (2005)PHFLE6000017000009093103000001.

    R. M. Jendrejack, D. C. Schwartz, M. D. Graham, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys 119, 1165 (2003)JCPSA6000119000002001165000001.

    R. M. Jendrejack, E. T. Dimalanta, D. C. Schwartz, M. D. Graham, and J. J. de Pablo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 038102 (2003).

    R. M. Jendrejack, D. C. Schwartz, J. J. de Pablo, and M. D. Graham, J. Chem. Phys 120, 2513 (2004)JCPSA6000120000005002513000001.

    R. Kekre, J. E. Butler, and A. J. C. Ladd, Phys. Rev. E 82, 011802 (2010).

    M. Fyta, S. Melchionna, S. Succi, and E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. E 78, 036704 (2008).

    A. Izmitli, D. C. Schwartz, M. D. Graham, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 085102 (2008)JCPSA6000128000008085102000001.

    J. P. Hernandez-Ortiz, M. Chopra, S. Geier, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 044904 (2009)JCPSA6000131000004044904000001.

    N. Watari, M. Makino, N. Kikuchi, R. G. Larson, and M. Doi, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 094902 (2007)JCPSA6000126000009094902000001.

    J. P. Hernandez-Ortiz, J. J. de Pablo, and M. D. Graham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140602 (2007).

    J. Rotne and S. Prager, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 4831 (1969)JCPSA6000050000011004831000001.

    H. Yamakawa, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 436 (1970)JCPSA6000053000001000436000001.

    R. M. Jendrejack, M. D. Graham, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys 113, 2894 (2000)JCPSA6000113000007002894000001.

    A. J. Banchio and J. F. Brady, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10323 (2003)JCPSA6000118000022010323000001.

    P. Pranay, S. G. Anekal, J. P. Hernandez-Ortiz, and M. D. Graham, Phys. Fluids 22, 123103 (2010)PHFLE6000022000012123103000001.

    B. Chun and A. J. C. Ladd, Phys. Rev. E 75, 066705 (2007).

    Y. Zhang, A. Donev, T. Weisgraber, B. J. Alder, M. D. Graham, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys 130, 234902 (2009)JCPSA6000130000023234902000001.

    A. Malevanets and R. Kapral, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8605 (1999)JCPSA6000110000017008605000001.

    I. O. Götze, H. Noguchi, and G. Gompper, Phys. Rev. E 76, 046705 (2007).

    I. V. Pivkin and G. E. Karniadakis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 206001 (2006).

    R. M. Jendrejack, J. J. de Pablo, and M. D. Graham, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7752 (2002)JCPSA6000116000017007752000001.

    M. Fixman, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 1527 (1978)JCPSA6000069000004001527000001.


Figures (16)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close