LOG IN or SELECT A PURCHASE OPTION:
J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074504 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3679751 (10 pages)
A fresh look at dense hydrogen under pressure. IV. Two structural models on the road from paired to monatomic hydrogen, via a possible non-crystalline phase
(Received 19 September 2011; accepted 6 January 2012; published online 15 February 2012)
, the other to space group R
m. In Pa
one moves from effective 1-coordination, a molecule, to a simple cubic 6-coordinated structure but through a very special point (the golden mean is involved) of 7-coordination. In R
m, the evolution is from 1 to 4 and then to 3 to 6-coordinate. If one studies the enthalpy as a function of pressure as these two structures evolve (δ increases), one sees the expected stabilization of minima with increased coordination (moving from 1 to 6 to 7 in the Pa
structure, for instance). Interestingly, at some specific pressures, there are in both structures relatively large regions of phase space where the enthalpy remains roughly the same. Although the structures studied are always higher in enthalpy than the computationally best structures for solid hydrogen – those emerging from the Pickard and Needs or McMahon and Ceperley numerical laboratories – this result is suggestive of the possibility of a microscopically non-crystalline or “soft” phase of hydrogen at elevated pressures, one in which there is a substantial range of roughly equi-enthalpic geometries available to the system. A scaling argument for potential dynamic stabilization of such a phase is presented.© 2012 American Institute of Physics
Article Outline
- INTRODUCTION
- COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS
- PROGRESSIVE EQUALIZATION OF PROTON-PROTON DISTANCES, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF PAIRING: TWO PERIODIC MODELS
- Description of the structures
- Evolving coordination numbers
- At which density might the proton pairs seek to dissociate?
- A non-crystalline phase?
- A scaling argument
- Relative enthalpy of the
Pa
and
R
m
structures with respect to other candidates
- CONCLUDING COMMENTS
- GENERAL CONCLUSION
EDITORIALLY RELATED
- A fresh look at dense hydrogen under pressure. I. An introduction to the problem, and an index probing equalization of H–H distances
Vanessa Labet et al.
J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074501 (2012)JCPSA6000136000007074501000001 - A fresh look at dense hydrogen under pressure. II. Chemical and physical models aiding our understanding of evolving H–H separations
Vanessa Labet et al.
J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074502 (2012)JCPSA6000136000007074502000001 - A fresh look at dense hydrogen under pressure. III. Two competing effects and the resulting intra-molecular H-H separation in solid hydrogen under pressure
Vanessa Labet et al.
J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074503 (2012)JCPSA6000136000007074503000001
Related Articles
RELATED DATABASES
KEYWORDS and PACS
ARTICLE DATA
-
J. Van Kranendonk, Solid Hydrogen (Plenum, New York, 1983).
V. Labet, R. Hoffmann, and N. W. Ashcroft, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074503 (2012)JCPSA6000136000007074503000001.
E. Wigner and H. B. Huntington, J. Chem. Phys. 3, 764 (1935)JCPSA6000003000012000764000001.
H. K. Mao and R. J. Hemley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 671 (1994).
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997).
J. Felsteiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 1025 (1965).
F. London, Phys. Rev. 54, 947 (1938).
Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

















This Publication
Scitation
SPIN
Google Scholar
PubMed